SUNSHINE ACRES PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION
ANNUAL MEETING
July 20, 2005
CALL
TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order by Dave Taney at 7:04 p.m. We are
here
for the Annual Meeting of the SAPOA general membership. We have,
currently, around 380 paid SAPOA members. To have a quorum for a
meeting
like this we need 10% of the voting members to be here, which would be
38. We only have 25 members, so we are 13 short. I don’t,
realistically think we are going to reach 38, as people are finding
other
things to do. That gives us the choice to either drink a lot of
coffee
and eat a lot of cookies, or turn this into an informational meeting,
as not
having a quorum does prohibit us from taking any action that requires a
vote.
So, we will conduct an open discussion type meeting that doesn’t
require any
voting. I think that is what we should do and you will find on
the small
round table a Treasurer’s report, the minutes from the January
Semi-Annual
Meeting, which you are free to go through and read at your
leisure. One
of the first items on the agenda was open comments. So, at this
point we
will just turn it over to the people in attendance and we will address
the
subjects that you want to address, and try and answer the questions
that you
have. If you would, I have a microphone that I would like you to
use so
that we can pick it up on the tape recorder, and also that when you
speak
please identify yourself so we know who is talking for the recording
Les Stuhr:
Regarding
the Beach Road,
there are several things that
I think should be seriously considered.
The first one that I think should be seriously considered is
eliminating
the Beach Road Committee. I don’t think
they are of any value and I think they are being detrimental, since it
is my
understanding that numerous people on that committee were responsible
for
wasting SAPOA’s money on this recall ballot.
I don’t understand why it requires a two-thirds majority – why
are only
10% required to get out a ballot. It
would seem to me that should require close to 30%.
Be that as it may, I think that we need to
get rid of the Beach Road Committee.
Also, I think we should seriously considered just paving a
walking path
down the road and not try to put a road that people allegedly can drive
on. If they really think they are going
to put a boat down there, I think we should be honest with the people
and let
them know that they are not going to be able to take a boat down there
of any
size whatsoever. They will never get it
back out. I have talked to several
people who have had conversations with people who had boats in other
places and
they think that as soon as that road’s done that they are going to be
able to
launch their boat down there. They think
there’s going to be a dock and everything.
I don’t know where they are getting this information. I think that the people ought to be told about
the real truth about that Beach
Road. That
they are not going to be able use it, it’s that simple.
Irv
Mortensen – People have been misled that they can launch big boats
down
there and this is not true. I’m not
against people going down there, we will build picnic tables and do
some nice
things down there, but you know another thing we need to consider down
there is
we have to have a porta-potty or something down there for people. You take your wife down there and you know
we’re all older people; you know you won’t be down there 25 minutes and
someone
is going to have an urge or something; nobody even things about that. There are a lot of reasons that we need to
maintain that road. A lot of people used
that road before the flood of 1996/97 was in place for 30 years, so it
is
usable. Many people enjoyed it and I
think will continue to use it.
Lew – I would like to comment on
that. There are people, like my wife,
who can not walk back up that hill. The
primary purpose that I see for putting a drivable road down there is
not to
launch boats. I’ve launched my boat, but
I don’t have a 26 foot monster boat that you have to have 3 people to
manage. I’ve got a nice little 15
Bayliner and it goes down there and back up the hill very comfortable;
and I can
go fishing in it. But, that isn’t the
reason I would like to see this Beach Road driven on.
The reason I would like to see this Beach Road driven is because it
is a
wonderful and beautiful place to get away and sit and just have and
peace and
quiet. There are a lot of people in our
community that can’t walk back up, my wife being one of them. See what I am saying? It
would be great to have some picnic tables
down there, just a place for people to go and relax and get away from
and it
all, and get back home again. MartyTipton
– My husband and I just
moved here. We bought our home about 2
years ago and we are now finally here.
My question about the road is what is at the bottom of it?
Mussel Beach Road Status: Dave
- I am going to try to answer some
of your questions; take it in kind of stages.
I have been involved with Mussel Beach Road project since
1998, so roughly 6 or 7
years; and it goes back further than that.
Irv was involved in it prior to my involvement, so we probably
jointly
go back to 1996/97 when the big disaster hit it. So
back in 1996/97 they had 25 to 30 inches
of snow, which melted very rapidly with rain following.
It flushed out that canyon and washed out a
portion of the road; made it badly rutted.
From that point on until 2001, there was a lot of discussion
about what
should be done and what shouldn’t be done.
Finally the membership of the association and the Board of
Directors at
that time decided to go and get an engineered plan by a professional
engineer
of what should be or shouldn’t be done to that road. Over the next 2
years
taking it up to about 2003, that plan was devised and put together, and
approved by the Board. There were a lot
of pros and cons, and a lot of public discussion, but the bottom line
it was finally
approved by the members to proceed with the program.
Again, in 2002 figures that Beach Road project
was scheduled to be about $87,000/88,000 project. That
was the first presentation that was made
in 2001. Over the next years, every year
it went up and pretty soon it was up to $120,000; then it kept going up
to
$140,000. Finally the project got to
nearly $200,000. But, the bigger problem
was that we started talking to contractors and we sent bid applications
out to
6 or 7 different contractors, and nobody had the gumption to bid on the
project. They didn’t want to get
involved, is what it boiled down too.
This probably told us something that it was a difficult project
to begin
with. It was not a lucrative money
making project. At that point, in about
late April/May 2004, a little over a year ago, I met with a contractor
that was
one of that group and Clark
Land, who is the
engineer
of the original plan and said this is out of sight; it’s getting out of
our
budget. Is there anything else that we
can do? We came up with a revised plan
that was a, for lack of a better description, at least a good band-aid;
and,
maybe would have lasted a number of years.
But, the membership and the Beach Road Committee at that time
saw it
differently. That they wanted to proceed
with the original plan and that they would go out and get new bids from
different contractors. They talked to 3
different contractors and finally came up with a bid of about $125,000
to do
the drainage and road preparation of it.
It did not include the paving.
That would have been above and beyond that.
So that original $125,000 was approved and
the project was theoretically started late September, early October of
2004. The attempt at that point that
over the winter of 2004/2005, all the road bed would be constructed and
the
drainage would be in place, and the paving would be done in 2006 or
2007. That was the plan at that point. Things started and the very first day on the
job the contractor hid a buried sewer pipe and broke it, which started
the
downhill process. We had to go talk to
the sewer drain field owner, and get that relocated, which cost about
$3000 to
get that done. Then the project started. This project was supposed to be done in 60
days and if you look at October 1st, 60 days would have
taken you to
December 1st. It should have
been done before the first of the year ever rolled around.
In March, April of this year it still wasn’t
done. We were still finishing up 6
months later with all kinds of delays blamed on various things from our
interference, to rock walls that were not approved, to contractor’s
equipment
breaking down. One thing after another;
I could give you 15 different excuses as to why it didn’t get down when
it should
have been done. Or, for what was
originally
projected to cost. It ended up costing
about $145,000, and we still don’t have a paved road.
Backing up just a moment, we did send out a
ballot of couple of months ago that asked for the approval to borrow
$50,000 at
2½ % interest that would have allowed the paving to follow right
on the heels
of where we were back in March/April.
Had that been approved, which it wasn’t, we probably would be
looking at
a paved road or at least very close to a paved road this summer. We did definitely promise in writing,
verbally and every way you can think of that this would be a drivable
road this
summer. I would be the last one to deny
that. That was a combination of promises
made by the Beach Road Committee and the Board of Directors, and
membership
co-jointly. Everybody had the attitude
and the idea that this would be a completed project and possibly even
paved
this summer. Well it’s not.
Now what we are sitting with is a road that
its surface is nearly ready for paving.
When I say nearly, I want to emphasize that because it’s not
quite. There is some top dressing, some
grading,
some shaping that still needs to be done.
The question comes up now that if we took the lock off the gate
and
opened the gate, you could drive down to the parking lot, with a 2
wheel drive
car. But it is a rough rock road
surface, not unlike a rock road or gravel road would be in some farming
areas. But our concern, in fact one of
our ex-Beach Road Committee members called me the other day and said
the tides
are really nice right now and I would like to go crabbing and clamming. But, I am too old and too decrepit to climb
back up that road, can I drive down? I
said yes you could if we opened the gate, because the road is actually
passable. The problem is that if we open
the gate up and let people drive up and down it this summer, our
concern is
that indiscriminate driving may tear up that road surface and then we
will have
an extra few thousand dollars of repairs to make before we can pave it. In the middle of June we sent a letter to the
contractor saying where you are. Where
did you go, what happened? We gave you a
punch list of items to be repaired, 9 of them in count, to be done by
July 1st. We still haven’t
heard from you, though items
have not been taken care of. Now we are
expecting by July 1st from you a response that will say when
and how
you are going to address these issues, and when they will be done. If we don’t hear from you by August 1st,
we will assume that you have vacated the project; we will hire somebody
else to
finish the project and go from there.
Part of the contract, what the contractor called for was a
7½% hold back
for repairs. They were actually designed
for warranty type issues that came up during the ensuing year after the
project
was completed. We are holding $8,796 of
the contractor’s money that we should have, or would have paid him, if
it was
all done and done right. We are sitting
on about $9000 of his money and we have 2 options.
I want to point out that when I say we are
sitting on almost $9000 worth of funds, if you look at the Treasurer’s
report
that Irma just presented to you, you will see that it is really about
$6000 in
the bank. There is a short fall there. We owe the contractor about $8800 and there’s
about $6600 in the bank; which means if we had to pay up today, on this
spot,
we would have to dig in our hip pockets and come up with a couple
thousand
dollars somewhere, because we don’t have $8800.
Right, but we don’t actually have it in the bank.
We have $6100 available to spend. The
question has come, and I will turn this
over to Everett in a minute or two, now we have $6000 left, we’ve got
some
items that need to be finished up to get it fully ready for paving. Since the contractor did not do his part in
taking care of those items, we can hold that hold-back money for 1 year. This means, we don’t owe him a dime until
next March or April at the earliest. By
that time we will have another round of dues coming in and we will have
the
$8800 that we need. But, we are of the
opinion that we are not going to pay the contractor, period. As far as we are concerned he just walked off
the job. It is our intent to use those
funds to finish up the project and get it ready for paving. Now the problem is, the paving we know from
expense
estimates that we got are somewhere in the $40,000/$50,000 range. The problem is, in 2006, we still won’t have
$50,000 in the Beach Road Account to pay for the paving unless we can
get the
approval from Board members and the membership to borrow that money,
instead of
waiting 2 or 3 years for the money to come in.
That’s the rabbit we have been chasing for the last 6 or 7
years, always
waiting for cash flow to catch up with expense; and as we wait the
expenses
goes up. Normally you would get $30,000
in funds for Beach Road
each year from dues. But, we have
already gotten $8,000 of that, so that leaves us $22,000 coming. So, with $22,000 coming with the $6000 that
we have, gives us $28,000 to work with; far short of $50,000 to work
with. We don’t have this problem solved
yet. One of the problems and this goes
back to
what Les was saying and what Lew was inferring, and the next item on
the agenda
in New Business, is the Mussel Beach Road Committee.
Everett
– We need about $2000 of 1½ inch crush, just to get
the road with a little bit of crown in it,
instead of a sally in it, and to bring it up to the edge of the
culvert’s. The sides need work and that’s
another couple
of thousand dollars. If we were to put
the 5/8 crush on now, which I don’t think we should do because I think
it’s
going to wash away. If you look at the
little bit he put on there, it is washing away.
We would hire an operator and a machine; we’re talking $9,000 to
$10,000, to finish the job. Now this is
the money that we are supposed to not pay him the last 25% of, until he
was
done. But because of certain
individuals’ submarining the rest of us, that money got paid. The hold back money was supposed to take care
of any repairs after he was done for up to a year.
He does have a $12,000 bond. My
feeling is that we should approach
attaching his bond to finish this road, and hold our $8,000 for any
repairs
this next winter. I’ve talked to our
lawyer and she tells me I’ve got to file suit to attach a bond, but I
know
that’s not right. I am going to call L
& I; they are the ones I talked to before about some of these
things. Then what I have to do is call the
bond
company and say we have a problem. What
generally happens then, if the bond company goes back and says – hey
Jack you
better go back and finish the work to their satisfaction or we will
finish it
and what ever you have up for collateral is gone and your next bond is
going to
cost you a lot more. Remember, the last
paving was an oil and chip that lasted 30 years. The
only reason it failed is because the
drainage on the side did not take the water out; it undercut the bank,
the bank
fell. (A lot of people talking over each
other and couldn’t make out all that was said.)
Dave – The one thing we know
is that we are going to move forward and tonight we are not going to
really
resolve a lot of those issues, other than talk about it and get a sense
of
direction. Everett
– There are no holding ponds in the parking lot. The
2 stilling basins that are in there now
are all that are required. The later
phases of this thing is to clean out the 2 ditches so we have some
decent
drainage, build up the parking lot 5 or 7 inches, according to the
plans, and
some new gravel on it. Then there will
be parking on it for half a dozen people on it.
I don’t think boats and trailers are going to be the big deal
that
everybody is trying to make it to be.
Mussel
Beach Road Committee: Dave – At our last Board
meeting we
decided unanimously that the Beach Road Committee was no longer
required and it
was dissolved. I think we need a smaller
group of advisors, and I am talking about 3 or 4 people, who have some
practical experience in that area and who are committed to working with
the
Board to getting the job done before the millennium comes again, and
help to
maintain the road. People wanting to
volunteer for this please let Everett
know.
C.E.R.T: Leslie
Farrell – I am from the Greater Diamond Point area.
I belong to C.E.R.T. We will be
having a raffle August 20th
from 10:00am to 12:00pm which will be held at the Diamond Point Realty. The tickets are $1.00, or $5.00 will get you
6 tickets. You can pre-purchase tickets
by calling Vickie Taney at 582-0709. The
raffle is for buying a defibrillator for C.E.R.T. and will be kept at
the Fire
Station. Normally a defibrillator costs
around $2,000, but if we get it through the Fire Department we can get
it for
$1,000. Everett – A big
need that I see where something like this can come
in handy community wise, let’s say there is a fire, like we had a
couple of
years ago. People get a little anxious,
and some of us aren’t too young anymore.
When one of these emergencies come the fire department will get
manned,
not just fire department people, but with C.E.R.T.’s and so forth to
communicate to the community what is going.
So, we should have somebody at the fire house that can take the
defibrillator to wherever it is needed; as well as any gatherings where
there
are a lot of people. It is not going to
cover every incident, nothing does. It is
a step in that direction and it is a fairly reasonable cost. We just need some help. C.E.R.T.’s
needs funds. Right now Marydee Countryman,
Leslie Farrell,
John Moore and I have been sitting down and putting together an
emergency plan
for the Miller
Peninsula and
greater Sunshine
Acres. It also covers up to
Gardiner. The Ops plan manual that we
put together, say that the C.E.R.T.’s team, when they walk into the
fire
department, have a punch list and some guidelines to go by on how to
deal with
wildfires, Tsunamis, earthquakes, what to do to help our community. This looks like paper, but none of it is
cheap. It takes some money to put these
together. Marydee, I can’t tell you how
much work she has put into this. This is
the best document of this kind I have ever seen. It
is short, it is sweet, it’s too the point
and it covers what you need and doesn’t have a bunch of trash in it. The County is putting together an emergency
plan that you have to read 5000 words to get one get one.
This manual is not like that. Dave
– There are some brochures regarding Tsunami’s on the small table that
has good
information and a great map of Diamond Point in it.
It also shows the gathering point in case of
earthquake, wildfire or anything of that nature. So,
be sure you pick up one. Leslie has been
working hard to pull the
whole Diamond Point community together, realizing that there are 404 of
us, but
there are 300 in another community and 100 or so in another. There are close to 1000 residence out here
now. The card with HELP
or OK written on it
is so that during one of these disasters, you can put it in your window
and let
C.E.R.T.’s know if you need help or not.
That way time will not be wasted knocking on doors that people
are okay
and they will not be bothering you. They
can move onto other homes that don’t have signs or where the sign says
they
need help. The directions are on the
back of the card.
Board of
Directors Elections: Dave – As I mentioned earlier
tonight,
we can’t really take any action or vote on anything.
Back in March Dan Abbott resigned, leaving a
position open, which Sarah Kincaid has volunteered to fill temporarily;
until
the next election process came up. Now
we need to elect somebody to a full 3 year term. There
was a nominating committee appointed to
find people to run. I don’t see any of
the nominating committee here tonight. Attendee – What’s the position? Dave
– Let me answer that question in a direct way.
The Board of Directors is made up 7 people, who are elected to 3
year
terms. The Board themselves elect the
President, Vice-President, Secretary and Treasurer.
So you have 4 people with specific duties,
and 3 people who are at large Board Members. Sarah
has been filling in as one of the at
large Board Members who does not have any specific duties.
When the Board meets in September, the first
meeting of the fall, they will again elect their officers.
If you are eager to be a treasurer, for
example, I am sure you will get the position.
Irma and I are in the last year of 2 three year terms, 6 years. That is a very long haul, and we know that
next fall, a year from now, we are going to have at least 3 new Board
members. Somebody is going to have to
fill the treasurer position, the secretary position a year after that. We think, and it hasn’t been done before, but
we would like to see somebody step up this fall and take over those
different
duties and get a year under their belt while the real person is still
around. This would provide continuity
instead of
getting it handed to you, and say here it is, you figure it out. It took Irma probably 1 ½ years when
she
first started, to just figure out where she was. The
records were very poor at that time. Marty–
Are all the Board members from a different plat? Dave
– No. Marty – So each plat
is not represented? Dave
– No. We do not represent the plats
separately. We are members at large and
represent all of the membership. Everett
– The architectural representatives are the only ones who represent a
plat. Dave
– To answer your question, we can’t find people who are willing to
volunteer. It would be ideal when you
have 7 different members and we have 8 plats, you can almost cover that
one-on-one, if you could get volunteers from every plat.
We just don’t get the volunteers. We
take what we can get, with no reflection
on the Board. People volunteer and after
3 years the term is over. Irma and I
stayed
for the second term simply because no one volunteered. Marty
– Are there separate meetings for the
architectural representatives? Dave
– No. As I said we need to elect a new
member to
the Board of Directors, we’ll be looking as the nominating committee
has not
presented anybody yet.
E Mail
Newsletter: Dave - Les Stuhr mentioned
this a couple
meetings back, we have 404 members that we send a newsletter to 4 times
a
year. That newsletter is also on the web
site. Les has suggested that maybe let
those who have computers and frequent the web sites, pull the
newsletter off of
the web, print themselves or read it from web site, and not bother to
spend the
$.24 postage and $.10 a copy of more to get out to the membership. It is doable.
The only problem we see with it is assembling the data base, and
the
fact that many occasions’ people who go on the internet have a tendency
to
change servers or email address. So,
when you have 404 people it is really tough keeping an accurate data
base. For what it is worth, it is
something we are
looking at in order to cut costs in mailings, which continues to go up. Finding things on the web are generally
fairly fast. We get the meeting minutes
on in a few days; ballot results are on there within a day or two; so,
the news
stays fairly current. We have had 7000
hits (people who have looked at our site).
What we are going to do is when the next newsletter goes out,
which is
in August or early September, we put a little return mailer that says I
will
accept my newsletter via email or off the web, or something to that
nature. That way we will have a record
that says it is okay if we don’t mail you one.
The By-Laws do say that when we are having our general meetings
in July
and January, that notice has to be mailed via first class mail. We can’t do it then, but we can try it with
the other two.
Plat 6
& 7 Covenants: Dave – Each plat has an
architectural
committee made up of 3 individuals. The
first individual is the property owner; the second is an elected
architectural
rep; the third is a representative from SAPOA, which generally is
Everett
Stauffer. Those 3 people make up the
architectural committee of various plats.
Plat covenants are not the same from one plat to the next. They are somewhat varied, depending on where
you are located, how big the plat is and how restricted the covenants
were
first drawn up. The developments started
back in the sixties and have been really rapid the last 3 or 4 years. These gentlemen are in charge of okaying
plans for new homes, new construction and answering questions relative
to those
things for perspective and current property owners.
The gentleman who is the architectural rep of
plat 6 & 7, Woody Hill, as these later plats have developed, said –
You
promised me I only had to look at plan or two every six months; now it
is a
plan or two every week. Especially 6
& 7 has had a lot of development lately.
What the architectural rep primarily looks at is setbacks – how
far back
from the front; how back from each side; how far forward from the rear
property
line; heights of roof, how high a structure can be without blocking a
view. In some cases we, mostly I have,
tried to act as a mediator/arbitrator to help take care of problem
property
owners might be having. For an example,
in the Industrial Plat there is a 60 foot easement for an airplane
taxiway for
aircraft. It has been there since the
1960’s when it was originally platted, but only recently been used.
On Salal, this
backs up to
that property. There is a hanger with an
aircraft in it. The gentleman who owns
it wants to be able to taxi out of his hanger and taxi up to the
airport and
take off. Unfortunately the person, who
owns the property that has the easement going through it, doesn’t like
that. It is recorded with the County as
a taxi easement. But, this person has
chained and gaited, the property has piled brush and piles of rock so
that you
can’t get out with the airplane. So they
are about ready to go to war. Irv
– That is a Court deal, not for
SAPOA. That is an easement that belongs
to all of us. Everett
– State Law does not let Associations enforce covenants.
Dave
– My point in bring the whole thing up is this some of the things that
go on
that are above and beyond the normal scope of SAPOA.
We only have 2 choices and one is – that’s not
my job; two – we will try and help you out, but be aware that we have
limited
power and authority. What we have been
trying to do is play mediator or negotiator to get the two parties
talking
instead of suing. So far we have been
98% successful. The place was platted
back in 61 or 62 and SAPOA came into existence 84 or so.
So, SAPOA was not put into the
covenants. There are other Associations
in the state where the covenants include the Board of Directors, so
they had
some power to enforce their covenants.
We’re getting growth and some of it is easier to deal with than
others. Lew
– The reason we (SAPOA) has to exist is common property.
If we didn’t have common property we could
all go home and never come back. We own
the beach, we own 2 lots, we own a strip of land down along the end of Discovery Way
and
we own a settling pond – catch pond. Larry Meier – I beg to differ with you
a little bit. Assume for a minute that
SAPOA did not exist; that we could not get anybody to run for the Board
that
property would eventually revert to the County.
Everett
– No, the County would sue us for
not taking care of it. Larry
– Who are they going to sue,
everybody? Everett
– Yes. They can start charging us if they
end up
taking care of it. Dave –
We got into a discussion about the Beach Road and why not just give
it to
the County. That was one of the
options. We looked into that and the
County said – We don’t want it. Everett
– Even if the County wanted it, it is part of all of our deeds and it
takes
100% of the owners to agree to give that property away.
Dave
– We are kind of wandering regarding this subject, but the bottom line
is that
there is a lot of imperfection in SAPOA, whether it is looking at
By-Laws,
Covenants, how things are done, how things are managed, and all we can
promise
you as a group is we will try to do the best we can to what we can with
what we
have. Lew – I think one of
the important aspects of SAPOA and the Board
is not managing private property owners’ affairs or negotiating
disputes, which
we try to do; we’ve sent letters and such.
But, I think it is disseminating information.
Not too long ago there were reports of a
vehicle that was suspected of stealing building materials and stuff; we
have a
reader board where we disseminate that kind of information. It is part of us being good neighbors that we
watch out for each other. Like I had a
neighbor that was gone for two weeks, and every day when I came home I
drove
around their house to make sure all the windows were still intact and
the doors
weren’t kicked in. It is that kind of
stuff; disseminating information, we are a central group that collects
and
disseminates, and that is an important function I feel.
Dave
– If you go to the web site – www.sapoasequim.com
– you can read about everything we have talked about tonight. All the By-Laws and Covenants are there. There are a lot of announcements; phone
numbers, a notice of all of the meetings are there.
Somebody made a comment earlier about the
details in the meetings; we try to get real detailed in those minutes. I don’t know if you have ever tried to do
that, but I know Kathleen and I have done it on a couple of occasions,
but when
you take a 3 hour meeting and try to go through it word for word, and
usually
you’ll do it 4 or 5 times before you get it right, you’ll ask yourself
did we
really say all that in half an hour, or 3 hours. On
a computer it’s not so bad, as you can do
a lot of things in a short amount of time and it is easy for you to go
in and
download it, read it off the screen or whatever you want to do. They are there for posterity too.
It sure makes it a lot easier then filing it
in a box somewhere. One other subject I
want to throw out, just so it is common knowledge – we have a storage
unit up
by the airport, that has records in it going back quite some time. We have about 10 or 12 years of records in
that storage unite and it is time to clean it out.
We are going to try sometime this summer go
in there and get rid of records and trash from 10 years ago. We have ballots from 1998, and I don’t think
any one wants them anymore.
Open
Discussion: Enid Smith – I
noticed that there were
cables going across the road that you drive over. Are
they measuring traffic and where it
goes? Dave – The County
every 5 years, I believe, comes out and does
traffic surveys that use to project down stream when the next time is
for
resurfacing or maintaining the roads.
You know that Diamond Point is growing rapidly and the amount of
traffic
that is in here is double what it was a few years ago.
They are just counting the number of vehicles
that goes down each road so that they can project when they will need
to come
out and put a new sealer on it 5 years from now, 2 years from now or 10
years. That is what it is all
about.
Barry – I
just want to caution anyone that walks down the beach road to very
careful. The round rock was put all in
one place and it rolls under your feet and can cause you to fall.
Dave
– When you want to see what we are talking about when say culverts,
road bed
just go to the web site. There are a lot
of pictures, so you can tell what is going on.
Are there any other comments? Kathleen – Is the siren going
to be
fixed so that it is louder, so we can hear it?
Everett – This is a siren
that is very
old. It has been sitting for several
years. As it is used it will clean
itself up and become a little louder, that is what the fire department
is
telling us. It should cycle up and down. Right now the
cycler is broke, so they cycle
it by hand when they run it. That is
supposed to be getting fixed fairly soon.
That is going to be used for a real emergency, so when you hear that
siren go off, other than the Tuesday test, it is telling you that you
probably
need to listen to your Noah radio or realize there is an emergency
going on. You can get a Noah radio on the internet from
Costco for about $30. Some of the
emergencies we could have are a Tsunami down below; earthquake for all
of us;
wildfires along Rhododendron, Madrona Way and Mussel Beach Road. Michael
Fitzwater –
Talking about the fire hazard, which is the reason I wrote the
letter to the SAPOA Board regarding the SAPOA lots in Plat 6.
We’ve been here 9 years and it has never been
maintained. The Scotch Broom was over
grown and Mr. Stauffer went down last year and sprayed that. This
year we have a thistle problem. We are going to have blowing
seeds; it’s just
a complete hazard. I wrote that this be
maintained, along with the retention pond.
You touched on it, but I didn’t hear any answer. Is a vote
necessary on that? Dave
– To answer your question, it is an expense.
It is beyond the scope of what one of us would do. We would go
out and hire someone to come in
cut this brush and grass down. But, it
is within the budget and our professional services category. It
is something that should be decided by a
voting group, like if we had a quorum tonight.
So we will have to address it at a Board Meeting. There are many
lots throughout Sunshine Acres
with brush and grass that needs to be cut down, and it’s not. The
only answer to many of these problems and
many of you won’t like the answer, and that’s continued development of
the
vacant lots in Sunshine Acres and eventually will cure some of the
problems
while it creates others. When I moved
here to Plat 5, most of the lots were vacant lots and they all had this
problem. Now there are maybe 1 or 2
vacant lots and most of the problems went away as people put houses
up.
Attendee
– Back to the Beach Road,
how feasible would it be to just make it a hiking path instead of a
road?
Everett – We have had 3 votes and overwhelmingly
people have
said they want a road; overwhelmingly, 70%, to do a road.
You heard people here where people want to be
able to go down there that are not capable of walking.
A road, a pavement over that whole area
between the culverts is required just for the drainage.
The drainage design incorporated paving. Without
it, it is questionable how well it is
going to work at all. The paving is an
intricate part of that. Ken Clark of Clark Land
washed his hands when we wouldn’t do it all at one time.
That’s how critical he felt it was. Dave
– It has been a 10 year battle to get the road to where it is today. Over the last 3 to 4 years we have really
worked hard, maybe too hard, at settling the project and its been sold
to
enough of the people that it is past the point of no return, is what it
boils
down to. Larry Meier - I
agree we can’t go back. This is one of
those projects where you came
up with a good plan and I’m on board.
I’ll volunteer for the committee.
Dave – We could let people
drive down during the dry weather only, so as not to tear the road up. Otherwise, we will put a second lock on the
gate so keep the road and people safe. I
put in the newsletter awhile back our phone numbers; you know where we
live and
if you have any questions please ask.
Meeting
Adjournment: The meeting
was adjourned at 8:47pm.